Interesting semi-logarithmic graph - YouTube Traffic Rank
The growth in popularity of YouTube has been extraordinary. It has gone from an unknown, unheard-of site (not even in the top 100,000 sites, so off the scale) to the 5th highest ranked site on the Web, all in the space of 18 months.
This image, from Alexa, is an interesting example of a semi-logarithmic graph. The vertical scale (traffic rank) is logarithmic, while the horizontal scale (time) is linear.
Book-mark this post
Book-mark this post in Del.icio.us, Furl, Digg, Stumble Upon, whatever...
Mouse-over the image and choose your bookmark:
Alan Cooper said,
January 27, 2007 at 9:43 am
I love this example of the use of a semilog graph to emphasize the area of greatest interest in a ranking situation and will be using it in my precalculus class a week or so from now. I can also imagine that a loglog graph might be useful to get a view of high frequency small amplitude oscillations near the origin and/or big slow variations far away, but would be hard put to come up with such a topical example. Of course a loglog graph is also very useful for identifying a power law (which it converts to a straight line) and I would like to suggest that showing an example of this (perhaps with a non-integer exponent) might be a worthwhile addition to your page - especially since the loglog transformation of an exponential (which you demonstrate) is again an exponential so the only effect in that case is an overall scaling.
cheers,
Alan
zac said,
January 27, 2007 at 9:45 am
Thanks Alan for your suggestion, which I have implemented at Log-log and Semi-log Graphs.
BTW - I like your domain name! Very clever.
MathNerd said,
January 28, 2007 at 1:31 pm
Yeh, thanks Zac. It’s a really interesting graph. I remember the semi-log graph from school days, but we never had examples like this.
Moti said,
January 29, 2007 at 4:30 pm
One of the important questions is: why?
In this case, why did YouTube enjoy this tremendous growth?
The reason is the “force” that lies beyond much of social networking (MySpace) , part of Google’s rise, and Windows/office domination. It’s network effects. The more people are in such a network, the more the network is desirable. Further more, if one is comparing two such networks, their size is an important consideration.
Thus, we can think of the network as accelerating and not growing at a constant speed. A good exercise for students is to graph various such networks and compare the graphs and deduce the strength of the network effect.
zac said,
January 30, 2007 at 3:26 am
Ah yes, Moti - you have nailed Web 2.0 on the head.
The social networking force has many implications for institutions of learning. The old education model may have a limited lifespan…